While being interviewed on a morning show of Greece’s largest television station, Mega TV, the Metropolite of Piraeus Seraphim said that international Zionism tries to destroy family values by promoting one-parent families and same-sex marriages, and said there is a Zionist conspiracy to enslave Greece and Christian Orthodoxy.

When the Greek host asked him, "Why do you disagree with Hitler’s politics? If they are doing all this, wasn’t he right in burning them?," the Metropolite answered, "Adolf Hitler was an instrument of world Zionism and was financed from the renowned Rothschild family with the sole purpose of convincing the Jews to leave the shores of Europe and go to Israel to establish the new Empire."

What do YOU think about this?

http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles/blogs/greek-priest-claims-zionists

Who knows? If this stuff is true then I have to conclude that some of the most powerful people in the world are just ****ing bonkers! I think that not only does absolute power corrupt absolutely but it also makes those who wield it "bonkers". These people are just so abstracted from the trials and tribulations of normal people. History is full of evil people who did evil stuff. I would classify a lot of that stuff as "bonkers". Consequently, I would consider aspects of what you are asking to be potentially true.

I think it’s very possible that the Rothschilds do have a kind of empire. A shadow, banking empire, which by virtue of all that massive money, is able to exert substantial control over several governments. Kinda like the mafia does?! It’s the secret services that worry me. I think the CIA, FBI and MI5, and whoever else, are basically owned by the Rothschilds. I don’t think their empire as yet extends to Russia and China.

I often wonder just how it is that the Rothschild family and their "Associates" are supposed to have "lost" their money? With such vast quantities of wealth at their disposal, it is almost as if they would have to literally give their money away to "lose" it. Perhaps this meme of market volatility and boom and bust is not quite as true as we think it is? Perhaps it is more amenable to being controlled than we think it is?

I sometimes think that economics and the markets can be compared to various aspects of thermodynamics and kinetics. We have the gas equation PV = nRT. We have equations for equilibria. We have Le Chatelier’s principle. All money and wealth must be accounted for just as all atoms and molecules must be accounted for. So many equations and principles in chemistry would just simply break down if we couldn’t account for what happened to the atoms!! So much science would break down and cease to exist if we did not have macroscopic behaviour. A chemical engineer can control what happens in a factory because of macroscopic behaviour. I think that to some extent we have been sold a false paradigm about the markets. I think they are more amenable to being controlled because of their macroscopic behaviour. Unfortunately, if you assert that there is some kind of "macroscopic" behaviour in the field of economics or politics then it is often described as a "conspiracy theory". Fortunately, in the field of science, macroscopic behaviour is not dismissed as a "conspiracy theory" but is simply accepted for what it is.

I would speculate this: perhaps the Rothschilds were behind Hitler and the antisemitism? Perhaps the Rothschilds expected WW2 to be a kind of repeat of WW1, i.e. a long war of attrition over a relatively stable front? I don’t think the international bankers were expecting France to fall so quickly. I think the international bankers thought that the German army would waste 4 years bashing itself up against the Maginot line?! I don’t think the Rothschilds were expecting London to be so violently bombed.

An evil cult of Zionists who are up to no good?? Well, didn’t we have the Thuggees who worshiped Kali? Didn’t they strangle 100,000 people, or was it 1,000,000? Imagine what the Thuggees could get up to if they had top men running the central banks???